How we check

Standards-informed, human-led review that focuses on what actually affects real users.

We focus on

  • ✔ Keyboard navigation and focus visibility
  • ✔ Forms, errors, labels, and clear guidance
  • ✔ Content clarity, headings, structure, and reading flow
  • ✔ Contrast, spacing, and legibility
  • ✔ Consistent navigation and predictable interactions
  • ✔ Common assistive-technology friction points

What you get back

  • A clear report with prioritised issues
  • Evidence and examples (so developers can reproduce)
  • Plain-English explanation of why it matters
  • Suggested fixes and options
  • A pass/fix/re-check path to certification

The process

  1. Scope: agree pages, flows, and key journeys (eg purchase, booking, login).
  2. Review: human-led checks with clear notes and evidence.
  3. Fixes: you update the site (or we can help if you want).
  4. Re-check: confirm fixes and issue certification.
  5. Maintain: renew annually (Plus) or review all changes (Leader).

We can align checks with recognised guidance (eg WCAG) where required, but we keep reporting practical and action-focused.

Typical scope

Most sites don’t need “everything checked everywhere”. We scope based on what users need to do.

  • Homepage and key landing pages
  • Navigation, search (if present), and key templates
  • Core user journey (eg booking, checkout, sign-up)
  • Forms (contact, purchase, subscriptions)
  • Content-heavy pages (policies, guides)

Want checks mapped to a standard?

If your organisation needs evidence against WCAG or similar guidance, tell us. We can structure the output to match your requirements.